Sunday, July 6, 2014

Joseph Smith History

After much waiting, here is the next installment of my Mormon book, which everyone can now see on the Introduction page.  Plus, I've used my html skills to add a table of contents at the top of that page to help guide the reader to quickly go to the section he/she wants to read next.  (Napoleon Dynamite would be so jealous!)

Here is the new excerpt for all to enjoy.  This is still a first draft, so I'd appreciate any comments/suggestions.  Also, keep in mind that this is all exposition, so I don't show or analyze any possible negative aspects of Joseph Smith's life.  I'm reserving that for a later chapter on apologetics.


The Story of Joseph Smith

Joseph Smith was born December 23, 1805 in Sharon, Vermont.  By 1820, he had moved to Manchester, New York (near Palmyra).  Around that time, the city was taken up in a religious upheaval.  Only 14 years old, Joseph Smith didn’t know which church to join.  His parents joined with the Presbyterians, and Joseph wished to join with the Methodists at first, but he became a little put off at the perceived dissensions between the denominations.
One night as he was reading the Bible, he came across James 1:5, which says: “If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him.”  He decided to ask God which church to join.
Then on a cool spring morning, he went out to the woods, where he figured he could pray vocally without being heard or interrupted.  He started his prayer and continued on until his prayer was answered.  God (the Father) and Jesus Christ (his son) appeared and told him not to join any church, for they were all wrong.


This forever changed Joseph Smith’s life and is the one defining moment that began what we Mormons call the Restoration of the Gospel.  The belief is that Christ’s full original Church had died out with persecution in its earlier years.  The Christians who remained preserved many of the tenets, but without guidance from living, appointed apostles, there was confusion and apostasy.  The authority God had given to act in his name was lost, and Man was left alone to figure out doctrine on their own.
What transpired next was a series of stepping stones where Joseph Smith received pieces of the “Restoration” until the end of his life in 1844. I’ll briefly list these events in chronological order.
Springtime 1820: The First Vision (as described above).
September 1823: Joseph Smith was visited by an angel, Moroni, who described a buried record.  The angel told Joseph he needed to get his life in order and that in four years he’d receive this record and would begin to translate them.
January 1827: Joseph Smith married Emma Smith, someone who becomes very important in later Church history.

Emma Smith

September 1827: Joseph Smith acquired the buried record—golden plates—and began translating the writings into English.  Several people, including Emma, and friends Martin Harris and Oliver Cowdery, helped in transcribing the words.
March 1830: Joseph Smith had this work published under the name The Book of Mormon.
April 1830: Joseph Smith officially organized what would eventually become known as the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.  
The church quickly gained followers and kindled persecutions from those who opposed the movement.  Joseph Smith left New York and went to Kirtland, Ohio in 1831.  Several followers, endearingly named “Mormons,” also settled in Kirtland.  Later that year, Joseph Smith went to Jackson County, Missouri to begin another settlement.  Thus, over the next few years Mormons gathered in both Ohio and Missouri.

Kirtland Temple

December 1832: Joseph Smith began construction of the first temple in Kirtland, Ohio.  It was finished in April 1836.
Persecutions continued.  As early as 1833, the Saints (as we like to call ourselves) were driven out of Jackson County, Missouri into Clay County.  Then in 1836, they were further driven to Caldwell County.
The Saints in Ohio lasted a little longer, being driven out in 1838.  This group came to join the others in Caldwell County.
Toward the end of 1838, Joseph Smith and several of his friends were arrested, tried, and imprisoned, ultimately ending up in Liberty Jail in December.  After months of living under subhuman conditions, a few benevolent guards allowed Smith and his friends to escape in April 1839.
During this same time, one church leader who was not imprisoned, Brigham Young, remained with the Saints.  To flee persecutions, he helped lead the group to Illinois.  After regaining his freedom, Joseph Smith reunited with the group, and then named their new city, Nauvoo.
Over the next few years, the Mormons took swamp land, overcame disease, and built a thriving small city.  In 1840, they began working on their second temple.

Nauvoo Temple

In 1844, Joseph Smith was arrested one last time along with his brother Hyrum Smith, and friends Willard Richards and John Taylor.  They were held in the Carthage Jail for their “safety” as the trials proceeded.  However, an angry mob stormed the jailhouse, and killed Joseph Smith and his brother.

The Death of Joseph Smith

Joseph Smith’s live ended, but the church grew stronger in his absence.  Brigham Young became the new leader in his stead—directing the completion of the Nauvoo Temple—guiding the Saints away from persecution around 1846—and eventually leading them to arrive in Salt Lake City in 1847.  There, after traveling a couple of decades in their own Trail of Tears, the Saints were finally safe from persecutions.  In a few years, they took a desert and turned it into a thriving, and eventually large city.
Today, the church that Joseph Smith had started, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, has become a large church with millions of followers from all around the world.
Sources on Joseph Smith:
The Life and Ministry of Joseph Smith” from Teachings of Presidents of the Church: Joseph Smith, 2011: a good summary of the life of Joseph Smith.
Joseph Smith—History” from the Pearl of Great Price: the writings of Joseph Smith giving his account of the First Vision and obtaining/translating the Book of Mormon.
The First Vision: Searching for the Truth” by Ronald O. Barney.  Published in the Ensign, Jan. 2005: a brief account of the First Vision and several artist’s depictions.
Joseph and Emma: Moments in Their Lives.”  Published in the Ensign, Jul. 2012: a brief and interesting summary of the interactions between Joseph Smith and his wife, Emma.

Sunday, May 25, 2014

New LDS Music Resource: Facebook Page


As an LDS musician, I'm excited about the new church initiative: the LDS Music Team Facebook Page.

This new page is meant to be a community for LDS musicians to share music ideas, train each other, and to help meet the musical needs of each ward/branch.


I invite my fellow LDS musicians to check out the Facebook page and start participating.  To get all the updates (posts by "The LDS Music Team - USA"), make sure to Like the page at the very top.

To see the community posts you must go to the page itself and click on "Recent Posts by Others" off to the right side of the Timeline near the top:


Click on "See All" and it will show all the community posts.

Enjoy, tell your friends, and let's make something out of this.

Sunday, March 30, 2014

Noah As Intercessor?

The new movie Noah has come out with mixed reviews.  I've yet to see it, but looking over a plot summary, I can see how a lot of Christians might be offended and disappointed with the movie.  I suppose I would have to watch the movie, myself, to see what all the hubub's about.

The plot sounds a lot like the TV movie I watched back in 1999 on NBC.  That was Noah's Ark with Jon Voight and Mary Steenburgen.  I remember waiting with anticipation when the NBC promos came out, and then when the two-night miniseries aired, I was hit with: "What the heck is this junk?"  It was the Bible meets Waterworld.  (Heh ... wasn't Steenburgen in that movie, too?)

Towards the end of the TV movie, God says to Noah, "I'm still going to kill off all the humans."  But Noah said, "Don't kill us off.  We're good people.  Look at this."  And then he danced a little Jewish jig on the deck.  God laughed and said, "I can't stay mad at you guys.  Okay, I'll give you another chance."

And by some coincidence, the new movie has a similar incident.  I don't know the details, but near the end of the movie, Noah talks with God and says, "Give us humans a second chance," and God says, "Okay.  Here's a rainbow.  Don't screw it up."

So, in two different movies, Noah acts as intercessor for the human race.  That seemed to be too much of a coincidence, so I wondered if there was something in the Bible about this.  Do other Christian religions believe that Noah saved us?

As I was raised, Noah's Ark was always a story about how God destroyed all humans and animals except for whoever was on the Ark.  God's intention was always that they would multiply and replenish the earth when the disaster was over.  That is: reboot, not destroy the human race.  The story of Noah acting as intercessor just sounds like strange to me.

Let's check what it says in the scriptures...

Genesis 6:5-8  (copied from the LDS scriptures, which evidently includes all the footnote references ... coolness)

 ¶And God saw that the awickedness of man was great in the earth, and that bevery imagination of the cthoughts of his dheartwas only eevil continually.
 aAnd it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth, and it bgrieved him at his heart.
 And the Lord said, I will adestroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; bfor it repenteth me that I have made them.
 But Noah found agrace in the eyes of the Lord.

After a Google search, this seems to be where the "intercession" comes from.  God wants to kill everyone off, but he sees Noah and then decides to save him and his family (plus a few animals).  Note that ...

#1) This happens before Noah even begins to build the ark.

#2) There's nothing to indicate that Noah did anything to earn God's grace (that is, no intercessory speech to change God's mind).

#3) Assuming Noah had not pleased God, there's nothing to indicate that God wouldn't have found someone else to be pleased in.  That is, this account does not contradict the idea that God had always planned to save a remnant of humans and animals.

The rest of Genesis 6 consists of God explaining to Noah what was about to happen, and how God would save his family, including his sons and their wives.  Thus, strongly implying that the decision had already been made that humans were meant to procreate after the flood.

In other words, I can find nothing in the Old Testament account that Noah did anything to "save" us other than following God's instructions to build an ark and survive the disaster.

Plus, the idea of Noah interceding seems somewhat contradictory with the modus oprandi of God in other parts of the Bible.  When God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, he alerted the "righteous" and helped them to avoid the disaster.  In other words, God always seems to find and preserve the righteous.

Also, if God were to destroy all humans, then wouldn't that contradict the reasons why he created us in the first place?  And wouldn't that make him an imperfect God?

My verdict: the intercession of Noah is just some good Hollywood tactic for dramatic effect, but as actual doctrine, I find its support to be lacking and its consistency with other doctrine to be entirely absent.

For those of you who have seen the movie, I'd be interested to hear what you think.  Is it a good movie (despite having incorrect doctrine)?  Does it really stray too far from the scriptures?

P.S.  I'm still working on finishing the Joseph Smith story in my book.  I've learned that studying for actuarial exams adds more stress than I anticipated, and I've ended up taking naps after church on Sunday these last couple of weeks.  I'll find the time ...

Sunday, March 16, 2014

Pictures and an Update

I'm currently in the middle of writing the Joseph Smith story in my "Mormon primer."  I think I should be done next week for you to view.  I've also planned out what the primer will cover.  Here are the subheadings:

The Story of Joseph Smith 

The Book of Mormon

The Nature of the Godhead

Our Existence: Before, Now, and Tomorrow

I'm sure I'll change this around, and add another section or two.  It's just what I came up with today.

Also, I've decided to include pictures in the presentation.  I will be borrowing these from different websites, mainly from the LDS official websites when possible.  I will make it so that if you click on the picture, it will go to the website where I obtained the picture, which will also serve to give more information behind the picture.

Whether or not these pictures make it into the final printed product will be something to deal with at some future time.  I'm sure there would be copyright issues, and I would have to seek permission and all that.

The pictures are mainly to prettify (that's really a word?) my blog, as people really like pictures.  Every now and then I'll bring in a picture for demonstration purposes.  But on the most part, the text will be able to stand alone such that I can remove a picture if I had to.

Till next week ... adieu!



Sunday, March 2, 2014

To Reference or Not To Reference

Before I go too far with my book, I must answer these question.  Do I want to include references?  And to what extent?

As a work of non-fiction, it's sometimes useful to show references to identify where certain ideas/facts come from.  But too many references, and it begins to read like a scholarly paper.  Plus it takes a long time to collect all the details and format each reference, and is by far my least favorite part of doing any kind of research.

I see my book as an informal narrative, seeking to casually discuss different religious ideas.  By no means is it meant to be a rigorous analysis or a ironclad, irrefutable proof of my church's veracity (something, by the way, that I'll later prove to be impossible).  Thus, I will not bog down my book with all kinds of footnotes and distracting pinpoint references. On the other hand, I can't just give you all nothing.  I have to at least give credit where it's due, and leave bread crumbs for some parts you may wish to verify on your own.

I think the best compromise would be for me to provide informal references.  I'll always give scripture verses when applicable.  But every now and then, I may parenthetically reference someone else's work where you can go to get more information.  And hopefully they will not get in the way of the discussion.

Sunday, February 23, 2014

The Book Begins

Okay.  Here is the beginning of my book.  It's just an introduction to the introductory material, but it spells out what the rest of the chapter will consist of.

Also, you'll notice a new feature at the top of my blog: Page tabs.

Home = the main page that shows all the blog posts.
Introductions = the first chapter of my book.  As I add to this first draft, I'll put only the new stuff inside these blog posts, but the full text will appear on the Introductions page.

More tabs will come in the future as I get to those chapters.

Enjoy this first installment, and feel free to begin commenting.



What Is Mormonism?

Invariably when someone finds out I’m a Mormon, they ask me a slew of questions.  What is you guys believe?  What’s different about you?  What’s the same?  How many wives are you allowed to have?
There’s something—just—interesting about Mormons.  They’re controversial, while at the same time, “normal.”  How’s that possible?
In this book we’ll try to answer these questions.  What is it that attracts the attention of the masses?  Why are the Mormons considered to be controversial?  Why do some revere the Mormons, while others despise them?
Of course, as a Mormon myself, you will most likely sense a positive bias in my presentation.  However, I will try my best to provide a balanced view as much as I can.  I will attempt to present different viewpoints, but along the way, I will also explain why I personally believe the way I do.
<Note to my friendly editors … I will most likely move some of these “disclaimers” to the foreword (which I’ll write last)>
Mormonism, in my opinion, is a Christian religion.  Its doctrines are—I’d say—95% consistent with the doctrine of “mainstream” Christian religions.  This includes the doctrines of the atonement.  That is, Jesus Christ is the Son of God.  He died for our sins, and it is only through Him that we can be saved.  If we accept Him and follow his teachings, we can enter into the Kingdom of Heaven.  
It also includes the concepts of baptism, communion, marriage, a belief in the Bible, the power and influence of the Holy Spirit, etc.
However, there’s another 5% that is “new.”  These are the parts some consider to be controversial.  In fact there may be many reading this today that would say, “5%?  Bah!  Try more like 60%, or even 90%.”  To these readers, the 5% difference is very important stuff, even so much that perhaps Mormons should not be called Christians.  This is an interesting discussion, which I’ll save for later.  But for now, I’ll just agree that this 5% (or 90%) is of great interest to a lot of people.
This 5% includes the idea of prophets being alive today.  It includes the introduction of new scripture: The Book of Mormon.  It includes holy temples at a time when most Christian denominations don’t have them.  Marriages are eternal instead of “till death do you part.”  There are at least three levels of heaven instead of the binary heaven/hell.  Angels and humans are two manifestations of our same existence instead of being separate.  God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit are three separate entities instead of being a single three-in-one entity.  We are punished for our own sins instead of having “original sin.”  And the list goes on and on.
So, how about we start at the beginning?  I’ll start with a Mormon primer to introduce the non-initiate.  Then I’ll follow a brother/sister set of twins throughout their lives as I present a “day in the life” of the typical Mormon.  Keep in mind that this whole Introduction chapter will be mostly exposition, and hardly any discussion at all.  That will come in the later chapters.

Where the Mormons Came From
<More coming on the way…>

Monday, February 17, 2014

Oh, Say What Is Truth?

First off, never fear!  I am close to publishing the first piece of my upcoming book.  I'll have something next week.  It won't be much, but it'll be a start.

This week, I'll publish a copy of this talk I found.  This was for a Stake Conference back in December 2011.  Each attendee was asked to prepare a talk to present in front of 1000+ congregation members.  On the day of the conference, the leaders chose a person or two to give their talk.  I think they were given a couple hours notice, but no more than that.

I prepared this talk, but I wasn't chosen, and I've never had a chance to present it.  Well, here it is.  Enjoy.  Keep in mind this is intended for a Mormon audience, but I think it would interest any of my readers.


Oh, Say What Is Truth?
When Joseph Smith prayed and asked which church to join, he was answered to "join none of them, for they were all wrong."  He was then instructed to establish the one and only true church.
We've heard this a thousand times, but what does it mean?  Today I would like to take a closer look at some of these other religions so that we might gain a little more perspective and be better able to see where we stand with our friends, neighbors, and colleagues.
First, I'd like to point out that ALL religions have SOME truth.  Christians believe in Christ and in his redeeming power.  Jews believe in a subset of our doctrine.  The Muslims believe in the same God that we do.  Buddhists and Hindus have a lot of doctrine in harmony with ours, inspiring people to do good one to another.  Even atheists and agnostics believe in that inner conscious that helps us to make moral decisions.
So why are there so many religions?  Why doesn't God come down here and establish which religion is true?
Because we have so many religions, each individual person has the opportunity to accept the level of truth he is willing to receive.  Consider a man who really loves Jesus and wants nothing more than to be with him forever.  If this person joins with any Christian church and lives a good life, he will gain in the least the middle Terrestrial Glory, where Jesus reigns.  After this man dies and is resurrected, he will have obtained his utmost goal.  He will be in the presence of Jesus for Eternity.
A woman who chooses not to believe in any religion at all still has the light of Christ within her, and following her conscious, she can live a good, rewarding life.  In the least she will gain the lowest Telestial Glory, which is still a fantastic reward for anyone.
Thus, he who seeks after truth will be able to find it, according to how much he wants to learn, and he will gain an appropriate reward.
Now consider the Catholic Church, which arose from the ashes of Christ's Original Church that was nearly destroyed.  It's so easy to harp on the Catholics for their mistakes - how they removed plain and precious truths as they translated and compiled the Holy Bible - how they corrupted the doctrines of the Early Church - how they instituted the errant Nicene Creed as core doctrine of all Christian churches.
But then again, consider everything they did right.  In Matthew 16:18, Jesus promised Peter that the "gates of hell shall not prevail against" his Church.  Though the full authority and priesthood powers were removed from the earth and enemies tried to destroy what remained, the members of this early Catholic Church persevered and successfully preserved a large portion of true doctrine.  Even the Nicene Council was a necessary evil to help strengthen a crumbling church.  Had it not happened, the gates of hell might have indeed prevailed, and the Christian religion might have died out.  Then where would we be today?
Consider Martin Luther who recognized some of the corrupt teachings of the Catholic Church such as the doctrine of monetary indulgences.  He broke off and started his own church in Germany, and he began the practice of translating the Bible to one's native tongue, bringing the word of God to everyone.
Other inspired men soon followed suit: John Calvin from France, and Ulrich Zwingli in Switzerland, and others.  Each of these Reformers broke away from the Catholic Church and began their own movements based on their own concerns and beliefs.
In response, the Catholic Church went through its own Counter-Reformation, doing away with the doctrine of monetary indulgences and other corrupt doctrines.  They became a better church - closer to the truth.
The result?  Luther, Zwingli, and Calvin all showed that the Catholic Church was not the one true religion.  Had these inspired men not broken away, our church couldn't exist.  Where would we be today?
Finally, true freedom of religion was established in the United States.  All religions can now exist together peacefully, and our Church was formed as it is today.  We owe so much to those who came before us: the Jews, the Catholics, Luther, Zwinlgi, Calvin, etc.  Just keep this in mind the next time you're talking religion with your friends, neighbors, and colleagues.  Even though they don't have all the truth that God has revealed, they may still be happy with the truth that they have today.  This is okay and we should respect their beliefs.  When they're ready to learn more, they'll ask questions - and from experience, I've learned that they almost always do, eventually.
When they do ask questions, be ready to answer.  It's good to emphasize the commonalities between our religion and theirs.  Where there are differences, present them matter-of-factly as points of interest instead of with a tone of "I'm right and you're wrong."
If your friends are Christian, they will most likely see no reason to switch denominations.  They have probably been baptized.  They most likely pray to God every day and receive confirmation of the truths that exist in their church.  They probably read their Bible and believe that it is sufficient for their salvation.  So most likely, they will ask, "What is so different about you Mormons?"  What they mean is "what's in it for me if I were to become one of you?"
When they ask this question, go ahead and answer.  If they like what they hear, they will pursue with further questions.  They will seek out further light and knowledge and they will receive what they're looking for.
How do you answer them?  What does someone gain from joining our Church?  Here, there are so many answers you could provide.  Choose a couple of answers as the Spirit guides.
Mormons have access to a living prophet who has a direct line of communication with God.  With times ever changing, this open communication is essential to keeping us up to date with what we should be doing in our lives.  Without this constant guidance, even some prominent churches are struggling today with some morally gray areas.
Mormons have access to the Book of Mormon, another testament of Jesus Christ.  This volume of scripture confirms and clarifies the doctrines taught in the Bible.  It relates some events that occurred on the American continent.  It restores a few plain and precious truths that were removed from the Bible and enables a person to have a better understanding of the nature of God and our relationship with him.
Mormons have access to the sealing power.  Couples can be married forever.  Families can be forever.  All other churches teach that marriage ends at death, but temple marriages can last through eternity.
Mormons have direct access to the Holy Ghost's influence.  More than just a conscious to tell us right from wrong, this "gift" can be a constant companion to reveal truth beyond a shadow of a doubt and to help guide us through all decisions we make in life.
Mormons can gain access to the highest levels of the Celestial Kingdom where we can dwell with God forever and even become just like him.  This is the ultimate reward for anyone who is willing to do what it takes.
Yes - all religions have truth, but there is always more to learn.  For those who seek, God will provide, and he "upbraideth not."
<end with testimony>

Sunday, February 9, 2014

The First Month

Yeah! This blog has reached its first month. Let's take a look at it while it's practically nothing. Then later when the blog is more popular, we can compare and see how far it's gotten.

Here is the viewing history since January 10:


This graph misses the first few days, where I had approximately 30 views. But look at that big blip around Jan 13, when I posted "My Book's Outline."  Awesome! My recent gun story (Feb. 2) didn't get that many views. Not as exciting as I thought. (Hee hee)  Or perhaps the blip represents all my facebook friends checking me out, and then the normal decay of interest afterwards. Or perhaps the peoples are waiting for me to start publishing the first part of my book (maybe in another month or so ...).

The audience right now is mostly from the US, while some 10% of views are coming from Malaysia. Whattup with that? I'm happy to get viewers from anywhere (as long as you're not some roaming searchbot). To my new Malaysian friends: Ngi hao!

Basically, since my blog is starting out, it's getting very little views. 130 total in 35 days is almost 10 views a day. We'll check again in a year.

For comparison, here are stats on my other two blogs:



The "Word of Mel" is my main writing blog. It's more established. It's getting 10 times as many views as my Mormon blog. Also note how only one recent post made it into the top 5 favorite posts. And I have viewers from all around the world. 100 views a day still isn't crazy cuckoo popular, but it's still enough to see interesting stats.

My economy blog is basically dead. It's the blog I neglect unless I get really riled up on an economic subject. Neglected blogs don't get very many views.

I'd be happy for this Mormon blog to do at least as well as my writing blog, and not die out like my economic blog.

We'll see how it goes. Thanks for reading. Tell your friends. More good stuff is on the way!

Sunday, February 2, 2014

Missionaries and Guns Don't Mix


I'm sure you've heard the stories. A couple of missionaries go knocking on some doors, and before you know it, some crazy dude is shooting buckshot at them. "Get off my property!!!"

I served my mission in South Korea from 1988 to 1990, and not even once did this happen to me. Two whole years, and the most that happened was some dude on the bus who yelled in my face. "Yahnkee go home!"

If you don't want to talk to us missionaries, I've seen the following responses, all of which are very effective:

  • Don't open the door (the most common response).
  • Slam the door in their face (second most common response).
  • Call the police because they're soliciting and there's a sign at the front of the community.
  • Invite them in for a good old Bible bashing session and explain why Mormonism is wrong.
  • Just plain yell at them until they leave.
  • Make up some white lie: "I'm Buddhist" or "I'm Catholic" and kindly shut the door.
  • Pretend like you don't speak their language.
Never once did anyone threaten our lives in any way shape or form. That is, until this past Sunday when my peaceful streak came to an end.

Occasionally, our missionaries will invite church members to tag along. So, I went out with them for a night of door-knocking fun. Reliving the good old days!

We arrived at our last house at about 8:50 PM. Right off the bat, something seemed off with the house. There was trash on the front porch. Strange things were hanging everywhere. Even before the door opened, we joked that we had just found Voldemort's house.

We knocked on the door, and no one answered. After a minute, we knocked again a little louder. The door opened and this dude with a big white beard stepped into the space between the house door and the screen door. He said in an antagonistic voice, "What's the problem?"

One of the Elders (that's what we call the missionaries) said, "There's no problem. We're from the church ..."

Right when he said "church," we all heard it ... the racking of a shotgun. Yikes! The two missionaries even saw the gun. The wife held it behind the door. It wasn't pointed at us, but the threat felt real. The homeowners' attempt to intimidate was successful. After some talking down and retreating, we were shortly back in our car and done for the night.

And let me tell you ... never having had any incidents with a gun in my life, it was a very scary experience. There's the whole, "Wow! I could have died!" Then there was a little PTSD for about a week afterwards. And there's also the "boy do I have a story to tell you" aspect. (Though I've found that people grow tired of hearing this story over and over.)

I can understand why the wife grabbed the gun. It was moderately late at night. Strangers were standing on her front porch. It would have been a prudent choice to have the gun ready to be used.

But as soon as they learned that we were harmless missionaries, why did they have to rack the gun? I can't find the justification. In North Carolina, it's against the law to threaten anyone with a gun if you don't feel that your own life is in danger. That is, pulling out your gun and chasing off a salesman or missionary is basically against the law ... even on your own property.

Yet, these homeowners stayed within the bounds of the law. Had they pointed the gun directly at us, or if they had verbally threatened something like, "Get off our property or we're going to shoot you," then they would have been spending a night in jail. Evidently, just racking the shotgun isn't enough by itself to determine assault.

Though, it certainly felt like assault. All three of us felt our lives were in danger.

Racking the gun wasn't protecting their property. That was just plain being mean. At the beginning of this post, I mentioned several different peaceful alternatives. In fact, we were getting ready to leave before they opened their door. 

Missionaries don't go around killing people who reject their message. They aren't a physical threat. They just want to talk. Sure, they can be intrusive and show up at the most inconvenient times, but do missionaries do anything at all that's worthy of being threatened by a gun?

I can't think of anything.